Showing posts with label commentary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label commentary. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Public Service Announcement to All Men Regarding Cologne

On behalf of all women, I'd like to make this public service announcement:

Dear Men of the United States,

Cologne is a wonderful thing, and the majority of women I know really really love it on you. But here's the problem: 95% of you wear the crappiest, nastiest, gag-inducingest cologne that was ever concocted. Where do you buy that shit, Dollar General?

Please, take my advice....

When shopping for a cologne, head to a nice department store. This is a project, you're not picking up a six-pack. The bottle you buy will (SHOULD) last you at least six months, probably longer, depending on how often you wear it (NOT how MUCH you wear!), so it's an investment of sorts. Give it a LITTLE thought and time. Once you pick one, you can stick with it for years -- it'll be your "signature scent." People will get a whiff of it and instantly think of you in warm and fuzzy ways (unless it's an ex-girlfriend, then one whiff will induce a split-second bout of homicidal rage). Besides, due to the fact that if you make the wrong choice, you're going to totally gross us all out forever, please, give pause!

In fact, if you're pressed for time, and like most men, this is just TOO annoying, casually stroll up to 2 or 3 counters and request a sample. Pick anything. If you're in a Dillards, Boston Store, or Macy's, pretty much all of it is going to be good quality. Maybe they'll give you a tiny little sample bottle, or if they're el cheapos, they'll hand you a little paper stick. If it's the latter, stick it in your pocket or your wallet. Shit, you've already got 10,000 useless slips of paper in there already, what's one more? Pull out the sample once in awhile and give it a sniff. If your instant reaction isn't "Mmmm nice," then eliminate it immediately. There is no "maybes" in cologne. This is how I found my current perfume - Dolce & Gabbana's Light Blue (the name is just a coincidence). When rushing from work to the subway each night, I walked through Macy's and nabbed two samples. As I was waiting for the train and on the way home, I'd smell each one. It wasn't until I had Light Blue that I went, "Yes, that's the one!" You'll just want to keep smelling it. Just like the love of your life, you'll just know. Quickly buy a somewhat large bottle and take it home. Congratulations!

If any cologne you're considering is under 20 bucks, put it the FUCK back. It's gross. This is one of those categories where what you spend is what you get. Really. You can have your nasty Head & Shoulders shampoo, your icky Zest soap, but when it comes to cologne, don't be a cheap bastard.

Now that you're home, what next? Well, remember, this is not a shower, and you're not covering up any weird smells (and if you are, go to the doctor, Dorcus Aurelius). Just splash a bit on, maybe your neck, wherever guys put it, I don't know. I've always thought the chest a good place. If you are leaving a Pig Pen-like cloud of stank when walking by, that's too much! If you hear furious coughing when passing strangers, that's too much! If someone says, "Does it smell like a pine forest in here to you?" that's not only too much, but it's the WRONG cologne.

This is how it's done....your sitting at your computer...minding your own business, not trying to be a playah...a woman walks up to you and leans over your shoulder to read your computer screen. She's chatting with you...and it's THEN that she feels it...it doesn't hit her, it tickles her, seduces her, caresses her. She'll breathe in deeply, then feel momentarily breathless, and her heart will pick up a few beats more per minute. She'll feel an instant surge of attraction toward you. She'll want to be physically closer to you. As any woman who has experienced a really nice cologne on a man, she'll tell you, it's a powerful aphrodisiac and we like it!

Trust us, when you do it right, it works REALLY REALLY WELL. You may think you're too butch to be bothered, but in the end, if you're making us all hot and bothered, don't you think you could climb down from that high horse and make the time? I do.

Thank you.
J. Cullinane

P.S. Perfumes of America is a website that can sell you expensive brands for cheap cheap! So, if you balk at the department store price, find what you like then go online.

P.P.S. Do not buy Drakkar Noir. No one with any remote sense of non-dorkness has worn that since 1990. And ladies, don't buy Eternity, please! There's a reason every time I get a whiff of it I'm transported back to my high school days.

Friday, April 27, 2007

In Defense of the Elizabeth Bennets of the World

This morning Spongie sent me the following email:

Found this when reading around after what Jenn had written about Colin Firth's Mr Darcy...

http://www.thefword.org.uk/features/2006/05/oh_mr_darcy
"Why do so many heterosexual women still find the Darcy figure attractive? Sheryl Plant ponders the influence of romantic fiction on women’s expectations of love and relationships. She discusses how lusting after the dominant male archetype can be interpreted both as resistance to patricarchy and compliance with it."

(It did strike me when watching the original BBC mini-series that Mr Darcy came across as a bit of a dominant grunt who had no idea of how to interact with women... so *naturally* the heroine changes her mind and falls in love with him. In Austen's defence, 1. power and social dominance are associated with male attractiveness, and 2. that was the nature of British society at the time - and some of it still exists within the anachronistic British public [i.e. private] school system.
I should know, being a product of it myself... :D )
----------------

Okay, *cough* hmmm. I have to respond (of course). Especially since I read the article and think it's a bunch of steaming horse poop.

I've been "living" in academia for a long time. I went straight to grad school from undergrad and then overlapped finishing my Master's degree with my full-time university position. I was immersed in all things professor for years and years. And here I am again, years later, back at a university, an environment I truly enjoy, but no longer have the same wide-eyed admiration for. The problem with academia is that they may challenge each other ruthlessly on their arguments, but outside of the "ivory tower" (the real world), they believe they are never wrong. It's because they're so damn smart, damn it! If you're smarter than the others around you, you must be right, right?

And this woman's article features the same ol' discourse you get used to. It's chock full of SAT-worthy words and a slightly patronizing style. The literature professors are the ABSOLUTE worst at this. Comparative Lit students were the ones all the other already overly-verbose grad students used to make fun of. Talking to a Comp Lit person was like trying to stir a giant vat of cooling molasses. They're all about complicated theories, and thick thick thick language, some of it simply made up words that your spell checker will go mad over, but scholarly journals will embrace. ANYWAY.

In a nutshell, the woman's argument is that we "feminists" of today still pine away for that arrogant, strong, dominant asshole (Mr. Darcy) and consider winning him the true prize of courtship.

I don't think this woman gets it at all. And to try and be fair, I will just speak for myself, and any other female who has been "sucked in" by Mr. Darcy can speak on their own opinion. When you watch (or read) Pride and Prejudice, you are initially disgusted with Darcy, yes. He's a dick. But the whole point of the book, and this is funny because I talked with Beau about this very thing last night when we were watching the last 20 minutes of the BBC series, is that you see the slow and delicious progression of the Elizabeth-Darcy relationship, who they both truly are, and how they both evolve and change. When you see Darcy at his home for the first time, speaking amiably with Elizabeth's aunt and uncle, you feel as if you've finally met the true Darcy, the one more at ease with himself and his surroundings.

I loved Darcy not for his initial arrogance, but for his later dedication, tenderness, and yes, though the author claims this is a negative attribute connected to (future domestic) violence - his deep passion. The more you learn about Darcy, the more you like him. All of us have met someone we initially disliked, and as we got to know him/her and learned of all the complexities of his/her life and character, have come to truly care for that person. When you first learn the truth about the real "bad boy" Wickham, your heart softens towards Darcy. When you see his great adoration for his sister, your heart gets a little mushy. And when you learn to what lengths Darcy goes to during the whole "Lydia-Wickham" scandal, your heart just about melts. There's a reason I put that particular still photo of Darcy in the blog. It's an important moment in the story -- Elizabeth and Darcy make a connection. She knows how much he loves and cares for his sister, and Elizabeth, easily picking up on the sister's verbal wound from the icky Miss Bingley, immediately rushes to care for the sister herself. It's then that Darcy gives her "the look" -- communicating not only his thanks to Elizabeth for protecting Georgiana, but his love for her caring nature (so different from that of callous Miss Bingley).

The author keeps claiming that the love for Darcy is the love for the bad boy, the jerk, the man who leaves you "humped and dumped." As she writes:

"I believe Jane Austen’s Darcy character still exists in today’s society and still holds some women in a love like trance, exercising power over women, using and controlling women to his (usually sexual) advantage. In all walks of life such men exist; he is usually the town womaniser or ‘badboy’, picking up and dropping women whenever he likes..."

Um, huh? I never saw it that way at all. Is it any more obvious that the one displaying all these attributes in the story is Wickham? (And Willoughby in Sense and Sensibility). Both of them play the charming, "dark-haired, " love-you-and-leave-you cad. In all likelihood, Darcy may well have been a virgin when he marries, as he is so disgusted by Wickham's womanizing in college.

And the author is forgetting one very vital aspect of the whole Darcy argument: Elizabeth Bennet! Half the reason I love Pride and Prejudice so much (and Mr. Darcy) is due to her. Elizabeth is one of the most popular female literary characters for a reason. She's strong, intelligent with a fierce wit, she's fearless, and she doesn't take shit from anybody. And of course, she has a heart of gold. Women just don't fall for Darcy, they fall for Elizabeth too. And as Elizabeth slowly learns about and loves Darcy, so do you. You feel they are well-matched, if not by socio-economic status, then by their personalities and character.

At the end, it's not the "Ha ha ha, Elizabeth has conquered that arrogant prick" as the author claims to be some sort of female revenge, simply because by the end, you don't think he's a prick anymore. By the end, you feel as if you've gotten to know who Darcy truly is, an aristocratic man (and all the pomp that entails), with a genuinely good heart and true intentions.

And you love him for it.

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Friendly Baby Boom

Today I received a Valentine's Email from a one-month old baby. My good friend Stanna, whom I've known since the first grade, had little baby Ava at the end of the year. A real cutie, eh?

I mentioned it in passing previously, but there seems to be an unusual baby boom going on around me. Not literally, thankfully.

The fact that I have lived in so many different places, has meant that I have also had friends in different places, of all types and ages. Yet, they seem to all have gotten together and agreed to get knocked up around the same 18 month period. Just now, off the top of my head, I'm counting seven babies, either just recently expelled, or getting close to it. I didn't know I still knew seven people. Just last night I got an email from a co-worker back in NYC who I haven't talked to in awhile -- quite obviously since she's due to give birth in two weeks! One of my closest friends from the same job just got back from her own maternity leave this past Monday.

Most of these pregnancies were planned, some not-so-much, as in my own sister, who just a few months shy of graduating from college (from a school, no less, that has put my mother "in the poorhouse" for my sister to attend), is getting ready for her own birth. I have to hand it to her though, she has celebrated her own pregnancy with more gusto than many of my friends, which is really saying something. I don't know anyone else who got their swollen stomach painted in festive colors and then took artistic photos (which were pretty cool looking, actually).

I hope I don't sound callous. I've been a teacher, and loved it, so I do like children. But I also have a lot of weird, uncomfortable feelings toward other people's children and their excitement in regards to them. And don't get me started AGAIN on my boiling rage toward a woman wielding a baby stroller!

I guess I just don't know how to process it, so I'm writing, cause that usually helps me out. In this case, it doesn't seem to be. What am I feeling? Jealous? Hmm, no doesn't feel like that. Annoyance? Only sometimes. I really am happy for my friends' happy packages. Longing? I only get that every once in awhile after a vivid dream or stray pensive moment.

Hmm, I don't know. I'm 34 and still don't feel rushed about babies, though I admit to thinking about it more than when I was 24. It's still basically the same thought though, "Yeah, I want to, just NOT NOW." And if my aunt (who is 3 years older than I with 3 boys, spaced far apart), tells me ONE more time "You better hurry, J, TICK TOCK!" I am going to put my hands through the phone and strangle her.

I still want another cat though.

So, I'll just try to be "happy with the question" instead of reaching for the answer. I guess it's like one of those things where you see everyone going in one direction and even though you're not going that way, you think, "Well, it must be SOMETHING important if they're all going there."

And of course, I am happy for all of you who have recently or are getting ready to give birth (YIKES!). CONGRATULATIONS! I do admire those who make the conscious decision to go ahead and completely change their lives, forever. There's no more sleeping in, no more wild sex in the living room, no more selfish vacations, no more ME ME ME!

When in New Zealand, I went with Beau to a end-of-semester drink fest at the local bar with several other teachers (all women, all Maori). At one point, two of the younger ones I was sitting near began an interesting, deeply emphatic, conversation on their views of giving birth. They described it in terms I had never heard of before.
- "It was great! You feel like you're superwoman!"
- "You feel like a goddess! You are so strong and amazing!"

Had to be the first time I ever heard a woman describing the birthing process as "great."

They continued on to talk about their profound love for their children and the overwhelming honor and love they felt in being a mother, as well as the utmost security they got from living in a small "family" village, where they knew their children would always be cared for, and always loved. One woman showed me a beautiful bracelet she wore of three, intertwined silver bands. She said they represented her three children, that she never took it off, and she never wore any other jewelery. Despite the fact that raising children in a small village was completely NOT what I was interested in, I still was deeply touched by their feelings, and it has stuck with me today.

So, go on with your bad selves, Superwomen! Goddess of Maternity! Hooray!

Just one request, please please please do NOT send me a photo of the ultrasound. I don't mean to offend, but i have ZERO interest in that blurry, warped picture. I'm sure YOU can see the fingers and toes (and penis!) and all that. To me, it's a fuzzy mess. I don't even know how to comment on it when I get it. "Ooooh, loooook. Um."

Instead, just send me a pretty K-Mart photo after the baby is born. Put yourself in it too! I find YOU just as interesting as your baby and love the parent-child pics. Now THAT'S something I can really ooh and ahhh.

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

Dell Computers SUCK!!!!

When I sat at my computer at work and slowly and carefully “built” my Dell computer just a few weeks before I left for New Zealand, I was excited as a pig in shit. Being the internet junkie I am, having one’s own laptop, a NEW laptop, is akin to getting a new car or winning a modest lottery sum. It feels soooooo good. I took my time, and started out with a base laptop that was about $600. By the time I had finished “upgrading” and adding all the bells and whistles I thought were essential or cheap enough to be justifiable, the computer came out to about $1100. Since that’s about what I had expected to pay when I first began my computer hunt, I was pretty satisfied. One little splurge was to give the laptop a dreamy blue cover that glistens in the light. When the computer finally arrived at my desk at work, I laughed and clapped and sang. The mail lady stood stupified and said that was the first time she had ever been cheered when delivering mail. I hugged the box and put it down, claiming I would not open it ‘til I got home. My co-worker Tina eyed me knowingly and said, “You’ll never make it to the end of the day.”

She was right.

At home as I set the computer up, I immediately noticed problems. After several frustrating calls, (the sales people were assholes, the tech people fairly cool), I ended up totally re-installing the OS. That’s not especially comforting in a brand new computer. I called them to replace it, but they couldn’t guarantee me a new one before I left for NZ, so I was stuck with what I have. Since then, problems have continued, though all minor. The new one, which though small, was INCREDIBLY FUCKING FRUSTRATING was the ceasing effectiveness of the spacebar. Now, I’ve had keyboards where a single letter, like “W” stops working, and that’s rather annoying, but easily fixed since keyboards nowadays cost like 10 bucks. What do you do on a laptop though? And what do you do when the SPACEBAR stops working? My god, could there be any key that’s sudden uselessness could be more debilitating?

Needless to say, I eventually KINDA fixed it after prying off the damn thing a few times and having a crack at it. I hate doing that, since often once you starting fecking around with the keyboard, it never works quite the same again, but I was pretty desperate. At one point I had it working, but then the “c” wouldn’t work. I hate Dell. I hate Dell. I hate Dell.

Saturday, November 25, 2006

Thanks for Giving Me...


When I was thinking of stuff to list that I was truly thankful for, I realized that it kind of sounded pretentious -- a state I try to avoid if I can. I've always had sort of opposing views about talking about travel. Obviously, most of my blog is based on my travels and what happens to me (which is often a bit like Inspector Gadget), so I can't hate it that much. But on the other hand, I can't STAND travel books and I hate when people go on and on and on about their wonderous glorious travels. It always seems like bragging to me, furthermore, a bit of a "ha ha ha, I've been somewhere you haven't, I have a lot of money, and now my life is more full and interesting than yours!" Well, since I'm always broke, and my life is a constant work in progress, maybe I can go ahead with what I truly feel anyway.

Things I am thankful for:

1) My husband
For years and years, marriage, for the second time, wasn't something I really ever planned, let alone wanted. Our elopement kind of surprised everyone, including ourselves somewhat, but now I know just what a smart...lucky....great thing we did. Marriage certainly isn't easy, and I'm slowly weeding out my more selfish tendencies after years of singlehood, but choosing Beau to be my best friend and lover for the rest of my life *knock knock* has been a true blessing, even for this non-believer. He's not just like me (though we are amazingly similar), and he's no opposites-attract type, he just fits every part of me.

I love you, Beau. Thank you.

2) Travels of a poor white trash chick
The only reason I ever got to travel at all was due to my major in undergrad -- French (and Political Science). I had grown up very poor in a very affluent Phoenix suburb, and dreamed of going to France one day, hell, dreamed of leaving the country at all, which was a complete fucking fantasy for someone who could barely afford her public school fees. As an undergrad I used my student loan money (and am paying like an indentured servant now!!!) to study abroad in Strasbourg for six months. This gave me the chance to do some traveling around Europe (bless Eurorail passes).

My master's degree, studying Southeast Asia, allowed me to travel to the Philippines and later gain a connection which led me to my job in Bangkok, Thailand. The salary I got from my Bangkok teaching job (mostly my end-of-year contract completion bonuses) allowed me to travel some around Asia and eventually to Australia and New Zealand.

And finally, due to Beau and I spending lots and lots of money (including him bravely cashing in some retirement money), we were able to move to New Zealand.

So you see, it's possible. Every time I meet someone new who finds out where I've been, I often get, "Oh my god, that's great! I've never been anywhere! I wish I could go somewhere!" You can! You just have to be like Beau and I, and be willing to go broke to do it. Naturally, not everyone finds that an appetizing trade-off.

But I tell you, as much as I hate being poor, I wouldn't take that money back for a second if it meant I had to also give up some of the crazy, awesome stuff I've been able to do. This is a fascinating place, this world of ours. I have seen so much beauty in every shape and form. We all make our own decisions and live with them...which leads me to...

3) I did it my way
I've purposefully carved out my life in such a way that I was an island for many years. On the con side, there's those lack of funds again, as well as a lack of familial support. But all the pro's I gained has been worth all those dark times of teeth-clenching, suck-it-up aloneness. Most of my decisions and the direction I steered my life in have been frowned upon by my family (and a good many more has completely befuddled them), and I haven't regretted it at all. In high school, my parents considered my French classes stupid since Spanish was the logical choice for one living in Arizona. True, but I didn't want to take Spanish. As an undergrad, I eventually dumped my pre-med major, and all the dismal grades it carried, and picked up French and Political Science. There was an immediate and continual outcry from my family. That moment changed my life. Not only did my grades and my happiness begin to shoot skyward, but I learned that life decisions have to be made by the person who is actually living that life, not others who have their own agendas. After that point, I took the reins of my life, and as Frank said, "Regrets, I've but a few." It's true. I've made dumb decisions, I'm not presently where I want to be in my life, but I have so few regrets. My life, for all its craziness, is a good, good life. I'm thankful.

4) My friends
I don't have that many, and I don't stay as close to them as I like. And the older I get, the less eagerly do I seek out or try to sustain any new friendships. And yet, my few scattered friends across the globe are real diamonds. If you're my friend, and you're reading this, I love you. Let's keep writing, no matter what. And if you don't hear from me, please, have faith and patience in me and try again.

5) My education, despite it's eternal poverty-inducing effects
As a poor, pathetic kid, I always saw education as that hidden trap door. That escape hatch that would get me out of a life I loathed. In many ways, it has -- it has given me travel, incredible jobs, and most of all...opportunity. To me, education always has been, and always will be, the vehicle of opportunity. As an adult, I can truly see now what having kind/intelligent/attentive parents can do for a child. I can see how money gives options. I can see how the right location can yield possibilities. I had none of those, but I had education, and it has taken me far. I have a lot of bitterness on how in this country today, if you are poor, and not a valedictorian of your school, you will bankrupt yourself to go to college, and UBER bankrupt yourself to go to grad school. I have student loans now that equal the price of a house, and I think that's not fair. You could say I chose to go to school, and I absolutely have, and I don't regret it. But it's real tough to be in grad school, surrounded by professors' and medical doctors' kids who didn't have to worry about Stafford loans, and not have that soft landing after graduation. NONETHELESS, I am thankful for my education, which has given me such interesting opportunities, and allowed me to live this life I love. I am thankful.

Saturday, July 09, 2005

Jury Duty -- First time EVER -- Day One

Ever since I turned 18, I have voted in every major election, and yet, I have never been selected for jury duty. I've been in NYC for a year and a half, and BAM, they get me.

I'd be lying if I wasn't a little bit excited. Sure, I'm damn scared of being picked and wasting my time in some stupid trial, but I'm also curious of the whole process, especially the interview portion. Unfortunately so far, it hasn't been much to write about (though I always do manage to come up with SOMETHING, *cough*).

My first day I made it here, barely on time, and entered a magnificient room with some impressive, if a bit faded and dark, murals of old NYC stretching across the walls. After gathering the required material, I made a beeline for the back of the room where I saw the internet hook-ups. I had come prepared! A friend had told me of this option, and I could think of nothing better than having internet while forced to sit in a room for hours and hours and do nothing but wait and hope your name doesn't get called.

Quickly I learned that this was Civil court, which I guess is fine. I'm uneasy about being a juror in general, since I am very uncomfortable passing judgement on some stranger which will likely dramatically affect his/her life forever. At least with civil, I wouldn't be putting anyone in jail, probably just deciding on fault and damages.

I was also deeply concerned with my ability to sit still and pay attention for long stretches of time. My ADD was diagnosed (again) by my current shrink, and he happily provided me with a prescription for Ritalin. My approach to Ritalin is the same as my approach to Dicyclomine, which treats my stomach problem -- only take it when you need it, which is fairly rare (I refill my Dicyclomine about once every 12-18 months). The last thing I want is another daily pill. I'm on a crusade to get off nearly all of them, but that's another blog. Anyway, now that I had the prescription, I did feel some relief, but still nervous. I have not taken Ritalin before (except for one successful experiment with a boyfriend's pills), just kind of suffered through long lectures and meetings, desperately doodling and writing notes to keep my mind "awake" and active. It's difficult to explain, but if I am forced to pay attention to one single thing (like a speaker) for a long period of time, it's like my mind winds down like an old-fashioned watch. It just ...slowly....starts....to fall asleep. And it's not even like I'm tired. It's a lack of stimulation, I guess. The actual advantage of ADD is the ability to be a fantastic multitasker -- something I've really appreciated and enjoyed in my various jobs which has demanded just that. The downside is lacking organization and focus, and appearing bored or sleepy during an important meeting.

So, now I have this prescription and I'm testing it out for the first time for jury duty. It seemed to work fine, which made me very happy, though I didn't notice any dramatic ability of hyper-focus -- I was still a bit fidgety and rather bored, but not only was I able to pay attention without falling asleep, but I didn't have that horrible restlessness of sitting in one place for a long time nor having that difficulty of getting comfortable and staying that way. This would end up being a real gift in the next several hours.

The first day I was called relatively soon, and with 29 other people, pushed into a tiny, windowless room. Being #24, I sat in a chair pushed up against the back wall, wedged between an old white woman, and a very old Chinese man who wore a rather complicated device to hear with -- the court official brought in some small box on a tall stand, almost like an old-fashioned camera, which somehow enabled the old man's hearing aid to work.

Soon the lawyers came in. They were almost caricatures in themselves. There were two lawyers for the plaintiff. The one who did all the talking was a tall, thin, black-haired Italian man who was rather charismatic and way too chatty for my tastes. We'll call him Vinnie. His sidekick was a complete creep -- a stout man, rather young, who had the eyes of that Runaway Bride woman, gigantic and round, as if surprised. And yet unlike hers, his had a sort of shocking intensity. He never seemed to focus on one thing, yet was always staring intently in one direction. It creeped me out a bit and reminded me of a terminator robot. Guess I'll call him Terminator for now.

The defense attorney was an older black man with slow movements and a voice like butter. In addition, his low voice had a lisp! It was such a strange combo, that I felt like smiling every time he spoke. Let's call him Ben.

We soon learned that the plaintiff had won the case already. Basically a personal injury accident where a man had been hit on the head by a falling brick at a construction site. Our job (if selected) was simply to listen to the evidence and assess damages. Sounded simple enough, until I learned the trial would probably take a whole week just to do that. Yuck.

Thinking, as I've seen hundreds and hundreds of Law & Order episodes, that the interview process would be fast, in a courtroom, and with a judge, I turned out to be wrong on all counts. We sat there, for nearly four hours, as time dragged on and on? What took so damn long?

For one, we all handed in our bio sheets which were methodically torn apart (giving copies to each lawyer), sorted by number, and then reviewed. During this entire agonizing process, Vinnie talked along, informing us of this and that, talking about the case, though making sure not to be too specific at all times. A couple of times he must have said something inappropriate, for Ben would ask him to step outside for a few minutes. It was so silly. And all this time, there was no judge.

Then, as Vinnie was going through, here and there he'd ask a general question to us all and if this would impair our ability to be impartial. Inevitably, there was always someone who feigned difficulties, and one by fucking one they were taken out in the hall with the lawyers to discuss it. This must have happened about 30 times, each time the rest of us sat there staring at our nails. And of course you could tell these "conflicts" were simply attempts to avoid getting picked, something I had expected I would do myself, but as I sat there and watched others do it, I felt so digusted with their completely obvious lack of honesty that I knew I could't bring myself to act that way. I didn't want to be on a jury, but I wasn't going to pretend that because one of my best friends was a lawyer that I just couldn't possibly be impartial!

Then finally, Ben spoke and talked about the case, smiling and having a laid back appearance, although he warned us that although we were all chums now in the room, back in the courtroom they were very willing to tear each other apart. He kept referring to the other lawyers as his "adversaries" which I found amusing and a bit strong. At one point he mentioned the entity that was being sued by the injured individual was a non-profit. That immediately got my interest, working for one myself! But as soon as the word "non-profit" left his lips, Vinnie nearly leaped out of his chair and dragged Ben into the hallway. It was obvious he was pissed and that was not supposed to have been said.

And honestly, it did suddenly affect my judgment. Although I am very sympathetic to injuries someone may sustain by the fault of others, working for a non-profit, and knowing how difficult it can be to simply survive, and how money is always an issue, it gave me pause in wanting to award a large sum in damages to the individual. But it was obvious that we were not supposed to know that and consider it, so I pretended to ignore it. But alas, one cannot unring the bell!

The only person who spoke aloud in the room about not being impartial was an extremely annoying woman I will call Miss Piggy. She had these really puffy cheeks and a turned up nose, and had put quite a bit of effort into her appearance, wearing lots of makeup and jewelry and styling out her blonde hair. She kept erupting into these tirades of laughter which sounded utterly fake to me, and just kept echoing in this diva-like guffaws, HUH HUH HUH HUH HUH! At one point, she raised her hand and said that when she heard that the plaintiff was a man who didn't speak English, that she had a real problem with that, making subtle, but obvious innuendos about an "immigrant" suing for money in a personal injury case.

WTF!?!?!?

She was also dragged out of the room for a talk as well.

Finally, with 10 minutes to lunch they sent us off, with no final answers. Since legally they had to let us go at 1pm, we were going to have to come back after lunch just to hear the final decision. I was pretty confident I wouldn't get picked anyway. I was #24 of 30 and from what I understood, they just started at #1 and selected people until they had 9 jurors (6 jurors with 3 alternates). I was sure they'd pick up 9 people before reaching me.

I went out and had a nice and long lunch with my lawyer friend. The stupid waiter at the Chinatown restaurant practically ignored us for 20 minutes, despite my various attempts to flag his ass down. This led to us getting our food rather late (I only had 40 minutes to eat by the time we met up anyway), and me being rather agitated. I was enjoying the lunch a lot though, as not only was the food delicious, but lawyer friend is always fun to talk to and I have seen him so rarely in the past 8 months or so. Recently, he has become an absolute powerhouse of knowledge on American politics, of which he seemed eager and happy to share. Luckily, I do love discussing politics as well.

A couple of times I hinted that I really should get going, but lawyer friend repeatedly waved his hand and pshaw'd me. "What are they going to do, fire you?" he joked. No, but picturing 29 restless people sitting in a room waiting for my slow ass wasn't an appetizing thought. Finally, we walked back, and I rushed back into the building, 20 minutes late! When I entered the room shamefaced -- everyone was there except for me -- I was relieved to see no lawyers. I was hoping though that they hadn't gone to the court official to report my absence. The old woman next to me leaned over and said, "I thought you had gone AWOL."

Shortly thereafter the lawyers entered to give the verdict on who'd be on the jury. Before that though, a couple more people had to be escorted out in the hall to talk about "scheduling conflicts." All these damn excuses!

In the end, ironically, it may have been one of these excuses that got me off. When asked if anyone had ever suffered a head injury, I raised my hand. As I may have mentioned in the past, when 18 and donating blood at my high school, I fainted and pretty much broke my entire face (and cracked the back of my skull). It was a pretty big deal, but in the end a lot of good things came out of it. Anyway, I think that may have been the reason I was not selected in the end. As they mentioned, they wanted to make sure people who had suffered head injuries could still be impartial.

But i was quite surprised though to see that there were jurors selected all the way up to #30, including the half-deaf old man next to me. Whatever! I was relieved to have slipped past the goalie this time.

We were then ushered back into the main hall where we sat for another hour or so before being let go early. Hooray! That wasn't so bad now, was it?

Monday, March 14, 2005

Shame of the Senate -- The Bankruptcy Bill

I am so totally disgusted by the Bankruptcy bill that is making its way through Congress, passed in the Senate 74-25. Being a person teetering on the brink of financial disaster at all times, to find that the Republicans have puckered up, once again, to kiss the fat ass of big business, and flip the bird in the face of the poor once again, makes me feel an overwhelming rush of rage, sadness, nausea, despair, and disbelief.

The Republican dummies, (speaking from the ventriliquost lips of the credit card companies) state that bankruptcy is used by people to run up big debt on vacations and toys and then a way to escape paying. Give me a fucking break. Look, EVERYTHING has its abusers -- extremists who make the vast majority of any group look bad (just ask any Muslim). Like welfare, there are those who abuse, but the majority are those who truly need it. To try and pretend you're passing this bill because most people are abusers just makes the Republicans look either like cold-blooded liars, or absolute complete fucking idiots snowed over by big business.

Personal anecdote: I was raised, along with my aunt, by my grandparents. My grandfather was very ill and was "medically retired," which forced him legally to stay at home, collect his meager pension from 20 years at the Wisconsin Gas Company, take his nitroglycerin, do chores, smoke his Benson & Hedges Light 100's (soft pack), and watch the Cubs play on WGN. My grandmother worked in the snack bar of a local high school cafeteria. Can you imagine how much money we were taking in? When I was around 13 years old, they declared bankruptcy. At the time, I didn't really understand what it meant, though I did see that it changed things. No more credit cards (no credit at all for at least seven years, as they told me), Christmas' were even bleaker (as was the food), etc. Was it a major change in our lives? No, we kept our TV and aging, constantly-breaking-down car. We left the house with the pool (pools being fairly common in Arizona), and moved into a modest apartment (with a pool somewhere deep within the "complex"). We never had enough money to take vacation, purchase a new car, or buy lots of "toys," so it's not like that suddenly stopped. Once in awhile we "took a drive" somewhere in Arizona to gaze at flora and fauna, including one memorable 6-hour round trip to the Grand Canyon, which lasted all 'bout 5 minutes at the site itself, since my aunt had developed a toothache, which forced us all back into the car for an immediate drive back. I don't really remember any drives after bankruptcy, though I'm sure that has more to do with my aging, ill grandparents than money troubles.

About a year after bankruptcy, when I was 15, I started working. Not to provide my family with bread, this isn't a Dickens tale, but I did find that after my job began, I was paying for all of my own clothes, most of my food, and other things (like various school fees and obligations which were enormous in the affluent suburb I lived in). We had to pay a friend of mine $1/day to pick me up and take me to school. Once in awhile I borrowed money to my grandparents, which they were careful to pay back.

But if you're one of the Republicans "chosen people" (anyone making over 100k and who likes to donate to the party), fear not! There are loopholes! Sink your money into that 25 million dollar home before you declare bankruptcy and you get to keep it! No one can touch it! Leasing that Mercedes? Nooooo problem, you can go and take drive any time you like. Don't fear the repo! as the Blue Oyster Cult said.

Watching one of my favorite political shows, for its breakneck speed and pure amusement value, "The McLaughlan Group," I was surprised to see that everyone on the panel (with the exception of Pat Buchanan, surprise surprise), found the bill to be "mean-spirited" and a payoff to the credit card companies who have been lobbying for this for several years. Evan the bloated, pompous Tony Blankley of The Washington Post, who usually makes me want to spit at the TV, agreed that the loopholes for the rich were unmistakely wrong. I watched clips of the enraged (and also bloated) Ted Kennedy rage against the machine on the senate floor, to no avail. Well, there's one rich guy who doesn't seem to get enjoyment (and cash benefits) from using his Bruno Mali's to squash the poor.

As for how the senators voted themselves, click right here to see how each one decided on this issue..

I was happy (though not surprised) to see that my beloved Russ Feingold (D-WI) voted "Nay," but shocked and dismayed that Kohl (D-WI) voted Yea. Then I remembered that Kohl is a multi-millionaire (you might be famliar with Kohl's grocery and department stores, the latter which are spread across the Midwest/Northeast). And Hilary Clinton did not vote? WTF? So, we all know she's started campaigning for President already. It sickens me that one must be a total sell-out, and if I believed it were possible, sell their soul to be President.

Obama, Nay, McCain, Yea. My other senator, Schumer, Nay.

To those 25 who voted with a conscience, I thank you. To the 74 who voted for the credit card companies, here's hoping you don't ever lose your job or become ill. Though I hear that senators get a pretty good health plan.

Sunday, March 13, 2005

Boring Semi-Update

Every time I write on here, I feel like I have to apologize for not writing for so long. Yeah, I'm doing it again. I actually began writing a post two times before, and both times something happened and the post went *POOF*! Nothing like losing a large amount of text to completely kill any shred of writing motivation.

If I knew a large amount of people read this, which they don't, mostly by my own choice so I can write with relative freedom, then I might feel obligated to update on the many happenings in my life, which I assure you, are not so exciting, but I don't.

I do feel obligated to re-write the couple of posts I began before, since they were fun blips in my life this winter. But now that so much time has past (one occurred at the end of NOVEMBER), a lot of the shine has faded away. Perhaps you can suffer through it anyway.

NYC continues to be such an interesting place to live. I continue to be in a state of agitation due to my impoverished state which prevents me from doing more things. At the same time, I feel this thankfulness for the chance to live here (for now), for the many opportunities it holds for fun and fascination. It's the simple fact that things happen here that just don't happen anywhere else that keeps my relationship with this place growing and warming.

I often reflect with both interest and bitterness upon the similarities and differences between my situation here and in Bangkok. In Bangkok I was flush -- money was rarely an issue, and though I faithfully paid off ALL my credit cards while there, I also made sure to play -- a lot. As my old posts attest to, a SWF in BKK is no easy life, and I combatted that my constant entertainment, basically, spending my money which gave me joy. I bought hundreds of dollars worth of books, I saw every movie that came out, I dined in all the expensive (and inexpensive) restaurants, and I traveled traveled traveled.

Yet, I'd still rather be here, and despite my lengthy struggle with anti-depressants and their wacked-out side effects, I am both happier here, and have a greater sense of peace. Does money buy happiness? Not in the general sense. But it sure does buy it in spurts and can help a shitty situation be tolerable, even enjoyable.

So, I don't have the cash here to see movies, which, due to the volume I saw them in in Bangkok, I have become a great lover of. I don't have the funds to fend off discontent or to take advantage of what the city has to offer (which is more than BKK). But, you take what you can get in penniless times, and as I will write about later, going to The Daily Show with Jon Stewert and "sneaking" my way onto the Law & Order set, are a couple of ways that makes life here pretty nifty.

Saturday, October 09, 2004

Back in Black

I haven’t written in a long time and a million times I’ve wanted to. Every time I’ve started to though, I’ve been overcome by this overwhelming sense of ennui. This is really unfortunate since so many things, most of them dramatic, have happened to me in the past few months. Most of them have been shitty, but some of them have been okay to good:

-- I protested at the Republican National Convention, which was kind of cool and interesting until the end of the night.
-- I moved out of my posh East Village apartment with two lovebird roommates into a shithole up up Uptown apartment in Manhattan and so, went from having just barely enough money to being fucking frighteningly broke all the time and becoming very familiar with cereal as a meal.
-- I got digital cable and a cable modem internet hook-up (*CHEER!*) and then my laptop broke down, once and for all. (*SOB*). It looks like I won't be able to think about buying a new computer 'til January which means now I'm fucked since my phone service is connected to my cable modem hook-up. So, if I get rid of my cable modem (which I should), I'll have no phone service which I've already paid all the expensive start-up fees for.
-- I was a part of a crazy medical experiment which tests brainwaves and was filmed by ABC for a piece on it. The cap I had to wear with electrodes all over my head and face was something I’m sure any of my friends would have paid to see.
-- I’ve became overly-medicated like my grandfather once was.
-- I have developed an unusually close relationship to a urologist due to a medical problem that seems to completely flabbergast him and completely piss (ha ha) me off.
-- My genial ex-husband suddenly turned into a typical asshole one.
-- Just when I thought maybe I was going to get myself fired at work I got one of the most glowing reviews of my life.
-- I briefly dated some guy from the internet who started off great and ended up being a damn disappointment.
-- I was bumped from the Jon Stewart show (*angry scream*) and was shepherded off to the Collin Quinn show which was a fun experience, though missing J.S. after not only waiting several months, but also taking off early from work and standing in line for an hour and a half and HAVING TICKETS as well. Jon Stewart, you’re show is great, but that really sucks.

It is my goal to write about all these things, but I don’t know if it will happen. I’ve been feeling pretty depressed. Let me rephrase that, I’ve been Depressed. Notice the capital “D.” I know the signs. It happened once before when I was in grad school – my “forever” marriage had ended by my own doing, the reigning love of my life (different person) had moved in with me, treated me like dogshit, and them moved out all within the space of a year, I wasn’t doing as well in grad school as I thought I would (I started off behind), and I was broke (familiar theme). I spent about a full year praying to the non-existent god to catapult me in front of a fast-moving SUV and end my fucking miserable life since I lacked the courage to do it myself. After an initial visit to the counseling service with the intention of getting help with my already documented memory problems (in grad school you have to memorize GOBS of material), I ended up seeing a psychologist and psychiatrist respectively twice a week, medicated, and six months later, I was noticing the blooming flowers and the blue of the sky.

This is one reason that every time I’ve started writing in this blog again I’ve stopped. 1) I hate spilling my private personal stuff all over the page like some kind of morbid road kill. 2) I hate writing stuff that makes me seem whiny, complaining, DEPRESSED! Nobody likes that. I’ve had enough friends who needed professional and pharmaceutical help to know that they’re not fun to be around after awhile. It’s like someone slowly drowning you in black water.

Anyway, not wanting to get to the point I was nine years ago where death seemed sweet and seductive, I wanted to get help. I have health insurance this time, but apparently its mental health component is pretty lacking. Not to mention that everything needs a referral and it takes six weeks to get in to see my regular physician. In one of the local papers I noticed an advertisement from Columbia University for people who thought they may be depressed and wanted to be a part of free services. To make a long story short, I was all over that. Here’s the catch: no talk therapy. Just medication. It’s free. They do all the medical tests, you talk to psychiatrist, etc. But it is what it is – a medical study. Medical studies have their own agendas as well do I. I’m there to get free medication, they’re there to use me as guinea pig to (dis)prove their theory. I have no qualms with that, though I do admit I was rather disappointed not to have shrink sessions. I enjoy therapy. I feel it was valuable for me last time (as was the medication). But this is how it is. They want to try and experiment to see the effectiveness of aggressive medication (I won’t get into it now) and no therapy. Hell, I’m curious myself.

This is why I tell very few friends about this blog. I like to write about my experiences in Bangkok and NYC which they usually enjoy reading, sure, but I also need this blog to barf out all this secret stuff I’m ashamed of, just like I did on this page today. Sure, to the couple of people who actually KNOW me and might read this, I’m pretty humiliated right now, but that can’t really be helped. I have some damn good friends in my life right now, not a lot, but I’d say the quality of my friends is fantastic. My mother’s been pretty great too for the past year or so (so strange that I’ve often wondered if she’s secretly dying). And yet, I don’t feel like there’s anyone I can really talk to about this, and let’s face it, Depression still has its stigma. In fact, I know one person I know who may read this and puke on his own. He’s never really believed much in mental illness.

And naturally, I’m ashamed of my own weakness. Sometimes I even surprise myself at how independent and strong I am. Sometimes I feel I can do just about anything (not in that euphoric bipolar sort of way, mind you! *cough*). Sometimes I think there’s not anything I can’t adjust to. And yet, here I am, nine years later, back on the weak track. Yes, yes, I know all the arguments against that. I know all about how it’s more about a drop in your serotonin levels than it is about being “blue.” Nevertheless, I am disappointed in myself. And I think it makes me less attractive as a person to know, as a friend or lover. I know that personally, when I have met men with an enormous amount of baggage, I have just flat out not been interested (unlike my early twenties when I would have relished the challenge to “save him!”). And here I am now, a baggage carrier myself. Blah.

Well, the pills begin tonight. In eight weeks I should be flying higher than a kite. Will it be me or the wellbutrin???

Thursday, March 04, 2004

Don't Touch My Bible, Gay Boy!

The Court’s obligation is to define the liberty of all, not to mandate its own moral code.”
-- The Supreme Court, June 2003, in regards to Lawrence v. Texas


As usual with my writing, (as well as with my oil painting), I seem to ebb and flow in my enthusiasm. This makes me wonder how I could ever truly be a writer seeing as how the essays I do read about “how to write” always feature authors lamenting at how they must force themselves to sit in front of a computer, like a job, about eight hours a day and pound out something. I find that rather daunting myself. I could see myself writing a book in eight crazy, 18-hour days, then doing NOTHING for six months. That’s just the gal I am.

Well, my boy John Edwards, as of 4pm today, will be officially out of the race. SOB! My god, now we’re stuck with Kerry, who excites me about as much as my phone bill does. I will stand behind him, because of course, ABB! (Anybody But Bush!), but what a pathetic turn to politics. At least I could get behind Edwards with some genuine enthusiasm.

And, I’m stealing this off of Cheek’s website, but I found this great. Of course we’re all aware of the gay marriage controversy recently. I find myself totally mystified to the actions of others, even if supposedly, I am in the minority (though I seriously doubt this). Why not let people get married? How will it hurt a society? As Chris Rock joked, “Gay people can’t join the military or get married? Damn, who’s got it better than that?” But here’s the list that was linked off of Cheek’s site. It’s great.

I find myself not articulate enough to fight these “political” battles (which makes me nervous in wanting to write, period). It seems just human decency to let people love each other and not be bothered by others and their beliefs. I have always hated Europeans’ smugness on how liberal their societies are compared to ours. But in reality, they are right in they are way ahead of us in their acceptance of their fellow human beings. I remember a Dutch man I knew once saying to me, “We don’t care what anyone does as long as they’re not hurting anybody else.” At the time I thought it was kind of stupid. As an American, I like order and responsibility and a general lack of chaos. But now, nine years later, I am envious of such a general view. A view like that seems to extend to everything as well. That’s why you find Europeans more laid back about sexuality (nudity along with it), religion, etc. Some may argue that their benevolent attitudes are changing after their recent influx of refugees from not-so-Western-European countries, but I am optimistic those jerks are the minority.

Now let me quote The Economist, the magazine, though WAY TOO EXPENSIVE, is absolutely fantastic in its writing:

“So at last it’s official: George Bush is in favour of unequal rights, big-government intrusiveness and federal power rather than devolution to the states. That is the implication of his announcement this week that he will support efforts to pass a constitutional amendment in America banning gay marriage. Some have sought to explain this action away simply as cynical politics, an effort to motivate his core conservative supporters to turn out to vote for him in November or to put his likely “Massachusetts liberal” opponent, John Kerry, in an awkward spot. Yet to call for a constitutional amendment is such a difficult, drastic and draconian move that cynicism is too weak an explanation. No, it must be worse than that: Mr. Bush must actually believe in what he is doing.”

That man scares the shit out of me. It’s so awful to watch someone fuck up your country and then hope in vain your one vote will make a difference. Which reminds me, FUCKING NADER!!!!!!! I think that article (I don’t have the citation) was right when it pleaded with Nader NOT to run. That the Presidential race was quite a different breed last time, but this time, things are more desperate, more urgent. Nader will only be a “spoiler” (a term we hear a lot lately) and screw things up the way he did in Florida where his 97,000+ votes yanked the mere 1000 Gore would’ve needed to win. This time we MUST get rid of Bush and Nader and his “Corporations own America! (only I can save you with my revelations!)” speeches make me want to throw up my expensive $10 NYC lunch. I watched him that day on Tim Russert and felt a feeling of dread washed over me when he defiantly claimed he was running and that the rest of the world who was against this could piss off and die. “We need a third party, blah blah.” You know, it’s not that people DISagree with you Nader, it’s just that we can’t afford for you to be waving your self-righteous flag right now. You know that morning that Nader announced his run for the Presidency, the entire Bush administration were popping corks of champagne, throwing confetti, giving each other high-5’s, and screaming, “You’re fucked now, Kerry!”

We’re all fucked now.

Friday, February 06, 2004

Fur?

Okay, I know I’ve been out of the country for three years, but what the HELL is up with all the fur coats? Did all the years of lobbying against them suddenly go by the wayside because of fucking J-Lo???!! Maybe it’s because I’m in NYC now; I have no idea, but there is a real proliferation of fur coats in this world. When I first started seeing them out on the street, I was so surprised. I thought it was some rare (brave?) person. (Where are those people with the buckets of blood?). But now, I see them quite regularly, maybe a dozen a day. Maybe they’re all faux fur, but I seriously doubt it. You can usually tell pretty easily.

Now, perhaps I should preach since I am a huge fan of leather for bags, shoes, etc. I’m wearing leather boots right now. Yeah, I know leather isn’t REALLY the same, but it’s not like I have felt a lot of guilt/sympathy for the cow. I don’t know where this issue goes in the black-grey-white world of morality. I do know that I wince every time I see one and avert my eyes. This guy seems to take his own “who gives a shit?” attitude. Every person on this earth is doing something “immoral” in their life – eating meat/too much food, cheating on their spouse/taxes, stealing money, smoking/drinking/doing drugs, not recycling etc. etc.

I guess it’s not going on only here. According to another article (quick google search!), “Even though the UK government banned fur production in 2002, British furriers have reported a massive surge in sales.”

Well, is it an issue like “If you don’t like the program, change the channel?” I’ve never considered myself anything near of an activist. Besides the fact that my personality is much too withdrawn and shy for the boisterous assertiveness that true activism requires, I’ve always felt like I wanted to wait for that one TRUE cause that I could throw my whole self behind, instead of all these other ones I feel partially-inclined to get involved in. Ultimately, I feel that people should be allowed to live their own lives their own way, though I’m no Libertarian (*puke*), as long as they’re not hurting anyone (do animals count?). I have to admit that I did become enraged when I read an article that said a photo of Jackie Onassis wearing a leopard-skin coat published in Time Magazine ‘caused such a rush to buy them, that the animal nearly became extinct in a year. Ugh. Totally sick.

Monday, July 14, 2003

Ceremony

I always finds ceremony interesting. I often think of what my old professor and friend told me about how grad students are like serial killers. They travel the foreign countryside, extracting tales from aging natives, scratching notes in notebooks. And then, as the aging native reveals his/her story, usually long held close to the heart, the storyteller dies, from the relief of release. I was aghast when I first heard this, and another professor asked if I had any respect for ritual. Hmm, I don't know. Probably not.

Of course, ceremony or ritual in a foreign country is a lot more interesting than in your own country, where you may not even recognize it as such. What I find fascinating (and also at the same time, sometimes boring), about Thailand is the need for ceremony at every level, for every reason, at any time. I have a quick example.

So, I’m at work on a Thursday, busy as usual. I’m at the tail-end of a staff meeting that I am running, including at that moment, a staff development seminar, where I am introducing a new writing activity for the classroom. A Thai teacher bursts into the room and after giving rapid apologies, demands that me and my assistant must immediately proceed to a ceremony about to start. What ceremony? Why? Where?

These questions are never easily answered in Thailand, unfortunately. Finally, I got a “where” out of the teacher and after throwing on a fresh coat of lipstick (looks are everything here), we proceeded to the named location. As we bypassed running and happily screaming children, we were directed into a small assembly room. We were immediately shocked to see lavish decorations all around, the Thai version of elevator music playing, and a small group of obvious VIP’s sitting or milling around. Through another set of doors a little dessert and coffee bar had been set-up. On the stage was a long table draped in pink satin with large arrangements of flowers placed here and there. What was this all for? The signing of a contract. The umbrella school I work at is about to (re)start construction on a massive building which will eventually house our own little school (as well as many other things). This large affair was for the simple 30 seconds of signing (and additional 4 minutes of photographs afterwards) that this would encompass. I was relieved actually. Often ceremonies like these can drone on for hours, where I find myself performing all sorts of Jedi mind tricks on myself to try and stifle the ear-splitting screaming going on inside my head, begging to be released from this motionless sitting position, where I have been listening to the same speech in Thai for over 45 minutes. I always want to sprint from the room, screaming bloody murder. My usual escape, if possible, is to feign having to use the restroom, then having a leisurely stroll around the hallway for as long as I can without arousing anger or suspicion. Then, back to my statue-like sitting and waterfall of thoughts. It seems the art of ritual here is the art of sitting still.

Sunday, June 15, 2003

My Lack of Moral Fiber

So yesterday I paid my second ever bribe here in Bangkok. Considering I've been here for nearly three years, and I daily ride a motorcycle all over the damn place (illegally), I consider that a bit of a triumph. That's kind of what happens to you here, you morals change. For many, they change dramatically. It's most interesting to me in Americans who are not aware of the intense sense of integrity that has been woven into their system through the years. "A bribe? What the fuck? What kind of backwards, corrupt place is this? Can't anyone DO something about this?"

The funny thing about morality is that it's really a facade, in my honest opinion. Whether you're a murderer or a priest, your morals are a very fragile thing. They can change much more easily than you'd ever think, and not because of some earth-shattering reason (someone's holding a gun to your head), but often, for something simple. My prime example: convenience.

That's the true reason most people pay bribes here. Simple convenience. You're stopped by a cop for some reason (and to be fair to the Thai police, the three times I've been stopped, I was breaking the law, though two of those times I didn't know it), and he tells you how he's going to write you out a ticket for like 400-1000 baht. Then you have to take the ticket to the police station (far away, and if you know anything about Bangkok, you know that it's a total hassle to do even the easiest things), where you will pay it there. You're sitting there in traffic, you're on your way to meet someone, go to work, etc. You flash 100 baht the policeman's way. At first he acts offended. After a few minutes of his striking several poses in your direction and looking over his shoulder to make sure other motorists are not gaping at him, he grabs the cash and waves you off. "Phew!" you whisper to yourself or to your passengers. "Glad that's over! Let's get out of here." The bribe is passed, you're on your way, and no thoughts of going to hell, bad karma, or the blackening of your soul crosses your mind.

Yeah, that's pretty much what happened to me. I was riding my motorcycle, with a friend on back, across the new Rama VIII bridge. Just on the other side is the infamous Khao San Road (a la Nasty Backpackersville) where several of us were meeting for an Indian meal. I was riding up up up the bridge, and after clearing the hump and coasting down, I saw him. The lone policeman next to his motorcycle, and directly in my path (the side margin of the road). I started going, "oh shit, oh shit, oh shit." Usually I just avoid eye contact, but I'd have to run over him to get past him, so that plan wasn't going to work.

Yeah, he stopped me. He then told me that motorcycles weren't allowed on the bridge at all! Okay, that was a bit of a shocker. Not allowed on the bridge? Not that there aren't other bridges, but it's not like they're set real close together, and this was a brand new one. He told me it would cost 1000 baht. A hefty sum here! (about $23 USD and about 1/3 the monthly salary of about 60% of Thais). And damn it, we were already late (I had the guest of honor on the back of my bike), and people were already calling us on the phone and complaining).

With such a giant quote of the "ticket" I was to get, I knew the policeman wanted a bribe. That sum was way too inflated to be real. I fumbled into my pocket, all the while apologizing and trying to be charming enough to get myself off, until I pulled out about 140 baht and told him that's all I had. He kind of sneered and looked around nervously, but I knew it would do. Holding out it plainly on a busy bridge wasn't too inconspicuous, so I rolled it up and held it low. He looked around, struck his various poses, and then did a move that would have impressed David Copperfield. With a wave of his hand and flash of light, my money disappeared and the friendly policemen said he'd even escort us off the bridge for our trouble. Wow!

So, there it is. My second bribe ever (the first was for driving my motorcycle down a "bus only" lane). Do I feel bad? Truthfully, yeah, a little bit. I am perpetuating a corrupt system. Why? So, I can get to dinner a few minutes earlier and make the bad policeman disappear! *poof* But really, it surprises you when it's over. You kind of go, "that was it? My eternal damnation was that easy and that...dramaless?" Yeah, pretty much. There goes my "Get out of hell free" card.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

QUICKIE BOOK REVIEWS

Sweet Thames by Matthew Kneale - A
This is my new most favorite author in the world. By accident, I noticed my swelling bookshelves housed TWO books by him (chosen seperately at different times and bookstores). I went on to buy a third book by him. All are completely different and completely wonderful. Though none can top the greatness of his English Passengers, Sweet Thames is still a kick ass book of mid-19th century when the sewer problem of London was reaching epic nasty proportions and the infamous Cholera outbreak was on the verge of erupting. In the center of all this is an ambitous engineer and his own personal dramas. Historical fiction is always my favorite and this guy is fantastic. Academic and accurate without being too serious and dry. Entertaining and funny without being ridiculous. And with the ability to make yourself feel connected to the most unfortunate character in the book. Or is that just me?

To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf - D
THANK GOD I finished this damn book!!! Oh Virginia, I tried SO hard to like this book. I felt some sort of obligation since you stuck all those rocks in your pocket and marched with such determination into the sea, yourself. But god, this book SUCKS! I hate stream of consciousness! I hated how this book dragged on and on and on like some sort of slow moving nightmare. I hated this book even more than The Map that Changed the World, and that's pretty bad.

The Lady Tree by Christie Dickason - A
Absolutely loved this book (more historical fiction) about young Englishman with a dark past who is forced into hastily earning a sizeable fortune in the crazy world of investment in 17th century Netherlands. I love any historical fiction that shows me a time/place I don't feel too familiar with (and that's not hard), and this book fit in nicely. It was fun to read and very gripping in parts, making my heart feel clenched. Absolutely recommended (though the whole Lady Tree part seemed totally irrelevent, though I know there is a sequel that should deal more with the actual "lady tree").

The Lost Continent by Bill Bryson - B
A very fun and often totally hysterical book to read about a now Englishman's (American-born and raised) road trip throughout the U.S. Fun to read, though it does drag on a bit and start to feel repetitive.

Saturday, March 29, 2003

War, What is it Good For?

I hate this war, I hate this war, I hate this war. Was this REALLY necessary? REALLY? Would Dubya place his God-fearing left hand on a stack of Bible's, raise his right hand and claim that our Lord could strike him down where he stood if he is lying (a favorite expression of my grandparents)??? Could he do it with a straight face? I have watched televised tomes of this war, despite the fact that it's only been a week. It's like watching Monday Night Football in the U.S. All the flash, graphics, and enthusiasm, yes, ENTHUSIASM for this. Though some of the enthusiasm seems to have waned since a higher majority of troops seem to be dying in "friendly fire" (hahahah what a ridiculous term!), then by Iraqi soldiers. And Dubya and that scary Rumsfeld seem indignant that the entire country didn't fall like a house of cards and the Iraqis didn't fall to their knees in adulation. Put it this way... I am no great fan of George W. Bush. I didn't vote for him, and I think he's been a fantastically flawed President (to put it diplomatically). If he was gone tomorrow, I might just throw a party here, complete with cake and confetti. And yet, I wouldn't want a massive, highly-technological force of Mongolian soldiers marching into Washington D.C., intent on murdering him and "freeing" me.

WHY WHY WHY didn't we just assassinate Hussein?? Was this SO damn impossible to do? If we hate him so much and want his "regime" to end, couldn't we have sent in some specialized spy to stab him, poison him, blow him up? Is this that naive of me to believe? Must we sacrifice probably thousands of people (on both sides), to get one man (and his sprawling family)? Are we really going to unearth the mother load of mass destruction? Is crippling the UN worth it? I volunteer as assassin. Can I get away with wearing a burka in Bagdhad? That might get me through. I could strap some explosives to my body and play the great martyr. Better me than thousands of others. Isn't that the point? No civilian casualties?

Friday, August 09, 2002

The Foreign Service Exam, and The Morality of "Ignorance is Bliss."

Can you tell by my reading list that I’m doing some studying? Mark, you’ll hate this, but I registered for the Foreign Service Exam and I decided to start cramming for it. Yes, I know, they're going to turn me into a slut in Afghanistan, sleeping with nasty Abdul the gundealer for information.

As for the studying, it’s fabulous, actually. It’s like studying for a big, important test, and yet, if you do terrible on it, who cares?? I’m really enjoying myself. Reading all this history, political science, and economics stuff has been fun for me. I’m learning a lot about the American Presidents, a subject I’ve never felt very well-educated on. Sure, it’s not the greatest source of education, but I really like these Idiots/Dummies/No-nonsense guides. I think they’re a good place to start. We all need a decent foundation in order to go into the minute detail of academia.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have a strange philosophical thought to put forward. In the world of “morality,” is something considered a sin if you only feel guilty when caught? Your immediate response might be “Of course not!” but in reality, I think it’s something to think about.

For example, you do something that is beneficial to you, and which would hurt your mother emotionally if she ever discovered it. Of course, if your mother never knows about this action, she will be in the land of “ignorance is bliss” and well, so will you, since you have benefited from said action. After a great deal of time has gone by, your mother does discover said action. Naturally, she is hurt and feels a bit betrayed. NOW…yes, NOW you feel like total dog shit. You didn’t really suffer from guilt (unless you are Catholic) up until this point. What you were doing was too wonderful for you, and sometimes something that makes you happy is difficult to see as wrong.

Is this way of action really wrong? Will it encourage us to do things that society considers as immoral, and then of course, try everything one can to not get caught? You know, although rules and such can be a pain in the ass, and when you’re a child, can seem so arbitrary, when you’re an adult, they start to make sense. MOST rules are created for a REASON. Some are more obvious than others, of course. But experience often tells us, as we get older (I’m pushing 30, kind of excitedly), that often rules are put where they are for a good reason (and in less frequent times, to benefit someone or others).

We tell people in society that if you hurt someone, and they are ignorant of that fact (thus they are not truly hurt), you are doing a deceitful, immoral thing. If you are gaining some pleasure from this unknown immoral act, then it makes it much worse, because you are gaining pleasure from the possible harm it could cause if it was revealed. It seems a bit abstract to me, and of course, society DOES tell us its immortal for a reason – we don’t want everyone going around doing things that could be hurtful to others for their own satisfaction!

Yes, I am guilty of said action. I have hurt someone. Am I trying to excuse myself? Hell no, I accept the consequences (and subsequent guilt) for my actions. And anything terrible I may feel right now is because I don’t enjoy hurting others and would love to prevent it. “Well, you should have thought of that when you did what you did.” Sure, maybe. In this life, if we are trying to be good to ourselves and each other, we try not to hurt them. And sometimes, we try to live life to the fullest, and sometimes that means doing what’s best for oneself. This may hurt people. Now, I am not talking about stomping on people on your way to the top (especially for some sort of monetary gain). I am talking about doing something that makes you feel alive, and then, if it is kept from the “right” person, you continue to feel alive, happy, maybe even fulfilled. Oh mother, now you know, and now you are hurt. And yes, I feel terrible that you are hurt, for I would never want that. BUT, if you did not feel hurt, would my action be wrong? Is it only the feelings of a person (who will hopefully one day forgive you) that makes something a sin? Ahhhhh “sin.” A Christian word. Sin, sin, sin. Sin is a slap in God’s face, when what we should really care about, is if it’s a slap in our fellow “human being’s” face.

I guess I don’t have a point. As someone who has tried hard to live life to the fullest, had a wonderful time, and still feel like I’m feeling awfully short, I do think that sometimes people get hurt, even though you don’t want them to, and even though your actions were intentional. I don’t think that necessarily always makes it so much more evil. I believe in regret and retribution, and strongly in accepting consequences for one’s actions. But like the tree falling in the forest with no one to hear it crash,…is it so that an action taken, that may make someone hurt IF they discover it, is that action a true horrible deed? A SIN? Maybe ignorance really is bliss, for all of us involved. I guess we all decide for ourselves.

P.S. OH god Oh god! They’re going to add a new Bob Saget sitcom to the lineup on my already super-limited cable stations here. *cry*

Saturday, June 22, 2002

Western Men and Thai Women

The whole Western man – Thai woman thing has been a touchy subject for me as a Western woman living in Bangkok. I’ve never found it so incredibly difficult to be single in my life. Though I am no great beauty, nor ever had much money, I’ve never had a lot of trouble finding a good relationship. But here in Bangkok, it has been nearly impossible.

To avoid being bitter and resentful, I have tried to understand these partnerships which are abundant all over Bangkok (and which make up most of my teaching staff). I read the depressing book, “Hello my Big, Big Honey” which is a mess of emotional letters written by Western men to Thai bar girls they have “fallen in love” with. It’s the kind of book that makes you want to turn lesbian, or else consider all men to be adulterous and gullible as hell. “I love you honey, and yes, I got your bank account number and will be depositing money into your account soon….”

Not too long ago I was coming home after a night class. I stopped by in a sandwich shop to have dinner. I was enjoying myself and the atmosphere (and reading a fantastic Iris Murdoch book). Not too far from me was a typical sight – a Western man with a Thai “bar girl.”

Wait, first let me give a very general definition of “bar girl” as it is known here in Bangkok. A bar girl is a Thai woman, usually from the poor areas of the North or Northeast (Isaan) of Thailand. Predominantly though, they are Isaan woman. They can be very young, ranging from about 13-40 years old. They’re often petite with dark skin. They’re easy to recognize after awhile just by how they look and move (and often by the display of a tattoo, often on the back of a shoulder). If you are to believe the studies done on them, many of them are already married to scummy Thai men and have a baby at home, and nearly all of them are partially to totally supporting their families back home.

Most of them work in bars, where they befriend tourists (mostly Western men, but often Japanese and Korean men too), get the men to buy them drinks, and sometimes, to buy the girl herself for a night of sex. Sometimes, the man can buy the girl for days on end. By “buying” her, he first pays the bar a fee for the revenue they lose by her removal from the bar. Then the man “tips” the girl for her services. Usually this can range from about $50-$150 (USD) a night. Considering that these girls are paid about $80 a month, you can see the incentive of having a Western man take you from the bar for one night. Now sure, as I mentioned, this “definition” is a stereotype in a way, and a loose description, but trust me, my broad sweeping generalization covers most of them.

Okay, anyway, back to the sandwich shop. So the bar girl is sitting with a French man, and he is speaking English to her (most bar girls have a fairly good grasp of English, which makes sense since the better their English, the better business they can do). The guy is going on and on in this loud voice, and though I can’t remember it all anymore, I can remember the gist. Basically, he was telling his personal philosophy on anything and everything, and it was lengthy, verbose, pretentious, egotistical, and fantastically boring. But of course, the girl was listening to him as if in rapture, with lots of nods and “uh-huhs.” Perhaps, that is the secret. To listen to a man go on and on and pretend that it’s the most amazing schpiel ever. Don’t get me wrong, I believe very much in being a good listener and caring about the people who are opening up to you, but that doesn’t mean you have to take, and listen to without comment, all the bullshit that comes your way.

On that same night, I took the “sky train” (subway in the sky) home. As I was sitting in my seat, fantasizing about being home already, there was another Western man – Thai bar girl couple sitting across from me. I can no longer remember details from the conversation, but I do remember the woman distinctly reminding me of a valley girl in her speech and tone, and the guy nodding profusely adding a mess of his own, “uh-huhs!” She was talking about how much she hated Indians (there are a community here and Thais in general do not seem to be fond of them for some reason). She had lots of reasons, and lots of “you know!”s. The guy was eating it all up.

Maybe the real secret is that when these men go to Bangkok, they step into another world. A world where anything and everything is possible. And let’s be realistic, if I was in France, I’d be interested in dating a Frenchman myself. I wouldn’t rule out an American guy at ANY chance, especially since communication is so important to me. But I know it would be interesting to date someone from the place you’re in. But really, in the end…it comes down to communication. I myself had a relationship with a Thai man, and similar to a bar girl (though not in the same profession!) he needed a pretty good grasp of English for his job. And though I cannot solely blame his lack of English/communication skills for my breaking up with him, it really WAS the major reason.

Which is why I always end up at the beginning. When it comes to ex-pats in Thailand, (lesser so for the tourists who come for a wham-bam-thank-you-ma’am), HOW do they maintain these relationships? I personally know about 10 couples of Western men and Thai women living here, and the majority of the women were former bar girls. How do they do it? And if you tell me “We connect on another level” I’m going to tell you you’re full of shit. That only works for the tourist boys looking for justifications for splashing into prostitution here. Does it simply come down to men and women demanding different things in a relationship? Or men not demanding at all?

My main demand is that I can communicate to a man. I don’t mean the whiny “Let’s talk about our feeeeeeelings” but about all sorts of stuff. I want to be able to talk to him about work, about the book I’m reading, about Israel and (the lack of) Palestine, etc. I don’t want to just talk about the weather and sex (though those can be pleasant topics too!). If men are from Mars, and women are from Venus, is Mars a very quiet place and Venus full of endless chatter? Shit, maybe I should move to Saturn.

Sunday, April 14, 2002

(World) War (II) and Sex

I saw this movie called, “The Land Girls.” What a delightful movie this is. Well, it has the shitiest ending in the universe, but we’ll ignore that. I wonder why I’ve never heard of it. It’s just appeared in the video stores here in Bangkok and I got a cheap VCD of it. It’s the story about three women who were “Land Girls” during WWII in the countryside in England. Because men were off fighting the wars, the women were sent off to the countryside to make food (much like the American women in the factories). It’s really fascinating because (I think) it’s a good portrayal of the behavior of people during WWII, even if they’re removed from the actual battlefields, out in the beautiful and serene rural areas. Still, people act a certain way in a war, and hell if I don’t like the rampant sex and desperate love affairs that it creates. And fuck off to anyone who judges. People do what they want, they don’t worry about social mores. And all those Dear John letters. Oh man.

The movie is a drama, but it has its wonderful comical quirks. This fascinating concept that we could die at any second, so let’s fuck, let’s fall in love, let’s get married! It’s wonderful in a way – it’s living life to its fullest, not taking anything for granted, in its most extreme sense. I try very hard not to take things for granted, like my time here in Bangkok, but I am human, it is impossible not to do it somewhat.

It has this endless sexual theme throughout and how each girl approaches it. The girls are all young and attractive – two of them are actually some of my favorite actresses – and there’s one son, of the farmer, on the farm with them. You can imagine what happens afterward. And of course, of the three, there’s always the cheeky slut. But she’s actually the least interesting character. And I really like how they have the “good” girl and the “proper” girl and they’re quite different from each other. They don’t make them total archetypes or caricatures.

I wonder what it is about WWII. Why do “we” find it so romantic, so enchanting, so endlessly fascinating? Vietnam was too shameful, Korea too short and obscure, World War I too far away. The stories out of WWII though seem inexhaustible. And I admit to being drawn to it myself. I wrote my major Scandinavian project paper on WWII in Denmark and did my Master’s thesis on WWII in the Philippines. I have often wondered who I would have been during WWII (I always see myself in Europe). I often see myself as either a saboteur or a Mata Hari type. Or of course, the person hiding a family of Jews in my basement. But I suppose we all imagine ourselves like this. Like the joke how every woman imagines herself as Joan of Arc or Cleopatra in a past life, and every man thinks he was…I don’t know, Alexander the Great? Napolean? What do men fantasize about? Or do they only fantasize about sex? Anyway. No one ever envisions his or herself to be a leper, or poor peasant, or beggar.

Friday, April 12, 2002

On Being Alone

You know, it really bothers me a lot that people cannot accept that one enjoys being alone and/or single. I tell people that it’s not that I don’t get lonely, (once in awhile I do), and it’s not that I’m an antisocial hermit (for god’s sake, I go out with friends a few times a month at least), but it’s this choosing to be alone that just bothers people so much. WHY?!?! That bothers me! I was reading a book once that said that the reason people get so annoyed with those who read on a bus, restaurant, etc. is that it shows that they don’t need others. Or something like that. Is enjoyment of solitude such a threat to society? I have my lonely moments! But not as often as people hope I do. Almost wish I do. I don’t avoid human contact. I’m no Walt Whitman in the woods. Why am I so strange? It’s opinions like that which make me want to be alone.

My new obsession with reading, or I should say, my re-connection with my old obsession, makes my solitude even more enjoyable. And I’m flying through books and loving it. A very long, hot, boring bus ride can be helped by a good book in your bag (I almost never go anywhere without one). And I love how I am once again learning learning learning from simple novels. It’s funny in a way, I almost TOTALLY suspended reading for enjoyment in college, and though I was being educated, I was losing knowledge as well. It just seemed like such a waste of valuable time.

What I love, is that if a novel is really good, really well-written, (and I try to be completely choosy on what I read), then you can learn real things, that you’d think you could only learn in something of non-fiction. For instance, I just read a successful book called, “In the Heart of the Sea” which is a novel about a true event (the attack of the ship Essex by a sperm whale and the horrible aftermath – it was Melville’s inspiration for Moby Dick). What a chilling book! But so interesting to learn about early American whaling industry, places like Nantucket and that whole culture (including the wives left behind for years at a time), and of course, the story of a boatful of men floating on the seat for 90 days. Every time I get really thirsty I think about this book. We all like to think of ourselves in extreme situations and think we’d be great! We’d persevere. But really, though I do see myself that way, I’m just a bit wussy girl. I can’t even live without my air conditioner in Bangkok. The one in the living room broke about a week ago and I thought I was going to kill myself.

Anyway, to get on with my point – Fuck all those people who scoff at the enjoyment of solitude. Enjoying solitude does not equate ‘psychopath in shack in the woods’ or ‘wild mountain milita man’ or ‘strange woman with 55 cats and a smelly house.’ I like going out with my friends – though I am VERY choosy nowadays who I go out with, and I sure enjoy men and all their delights, but I also enjoy being by myself – exploring Bangkok, taking all the time I want in a bookstore, getting IN and OUT of a mall without “window shopping” (*GAG*), seeing the movie *I* want to see, eating where I want to eat, and saying “fuck this heat” and schlepping myself back home as soon as possible. I LOVE doing those things. I love doing them with others, but I love doing it alone.

And screw all those people who think being alone also equates either a pathetic and lonely woman (who needs help), or a closet lesbian. Last time I checked, lesbians didn’t fit one of the three archetypes I named above. As I mentioned, I do enjoy having good men in my life, and have, for the MOST part, been lucky in that respect. The playing field is painfully reduced in Bangkok, but it’s still there. Send me an intelligent, cute, adventurous man with a sense of humor (there are a lot here who don’t seem to know how to laugh), and please make him speak fluent English. That’ll do for me.

Anyway, if my fortress of solitude attitude doesn’t meet society’s requirements for a normal person, then frankly, me and my 55 cats, could give a rat’s ass..